World’s Insurers Await U.K. Covid Ruling With Billions at Stake

World’s Insurers Await U.K. Covid Ruling With Billions at Stake

September 12, 2020

Insurers battered by coronavirus are about to find out how much worse the damage could get.

A London court is set to rule Tuesday in a case involving about 370,000 policyholders, companies includingZurich Insurance Group AG andHiscox Ltd. and potentially billions of pounds of claims. The U.K. markets watchdog brought the case after small businesses struggled to get compensation from insurers for losses suffered during lockdown.

“Insurers and regulators around the world will be looking at this case,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Sarah Jane Mahmud. The regulator “has never taken a step like this; it’s completely unprecedented.”

The Financial Conduct Authority is seeking legal clarity on disputed language in so-called business-interruption policies to help determine when payouts should be made. The ruling will be binding for the eight insurers named in the case, and could affect others that have policies containing the wordings, includingAllianz SE,American International Group Inc. andChubb Ltd. It will alsoprovide guidance for interpreting similar clauses in future court cases, according to the FCA.

96,551 in IndiaMost new cases today

-2% Change in MSCI World Index of global stocks since Wuhan lockdown, Jan. 23

-1.​067 Change in U.S. treasury bond yield since Wuhan lockdown, Jan. 23

5.​3% Global GDP Tracker (annualized), Aug.







Piano • Client Dashboard







  • An error has occurred





    m


    Bloomberg Business

    Get the best of Bloomberg delivered to your inbox daily

    Registering...

    Thank you for subscribing.


  • function setCookie(name, value) { document.cookie = name + '=' + value; }

    function isCookieSet(name) { return document.cookie.indexOf(name) != -1; }

    function cleanCookie(name) { document.cookie = name + '=; expires=Fri, 31 Dec 1900 23:59:59 GMT'; }

    try { setCookie(testCookieName, cookieValue); isStorageAvailable = !!isCookieSet(testCookieName);

    if (isStorageAvailable) { cleanCookie(testCookieName); } }catch(e) {}

    return isStorageAvailable; } function createTracker(clientId) { if (trackerCreated) {return;} var fields = isCookieStorageAvailable() ? {} : {storage: 'none', allowLinker: true}; if (clientId) { fields.clientId = clientId; fields.allowLinker = true; } ga('create', 'UA-11413116-1', fields); trackerCreated = true; piano.externalEvent('ga.created') } window.addEventListener('message', function(event) { if(typeof event.data !== 'string') return; try { var payload = JSON.parse(event.data); if(payload.event !== 'ga.setClientId') return; var clientId = payload.params.clientId; // Creates the tracker with the data from the parent page. createTracker(clientId); } catch(e){} }); // Waits for three seconds to receive the client ID from the parent page. // If that doesn't happen, it creates the tracker as normal. setTimeout(createTracker, 3000); } catch(e) { pnErrorHandler && pnErrorHandler.manualLog(e); } //# sourceURL=piano-google-analytics-script.js



    The London case is one of thousands of legal battles around the world centered on business-interruption policies that insurers contend don’t cover pandemics. In the U.S., New York retailer Century 21 Stores sued several of its insurance providers over the failure to pay about $175 million in claims, money the chain insists could have helped it avoidbankruptcy. In France,AXA SA agreed tocover losses sustained by several hundred restaurants afterlosing a court case brought by one owner.

    Read more: Interruption Insurance Isn’t Saving Anyone From Covid Shutdowns

    Given the number of policyholders potentially affected, and assuming each makes a claim of as much as 20,000 pounds ($25,568), the total cost could stretch to more than 7 billion pounds, Deutsche Bank AG analysts wrote in a Sept. 8 note.

    The insurers may not face the biggest burden, however, as long as the reinsurance policies they’ve bought to reduce their risks pay out, according to the analysts. “It is actually the reinsurers that potentially have more downside, while the U.K. primary companies should actually benefit from any clearing of the air,” they wrote.

    The case centers on sample policy wordings that capture most of the key issues that could be in dispute, according to the FCA. Given this approach, it “may initially be difficult to assess whether the overall outcome is a net positive or negative for the insurers,” the Deutsche Bank analysts wrote.

    The court ruling, which can be appealed, also probably won’t be the last word.

    “Many businesses’ insurers say that their policies differ slightly but materially from the test case, and there will be others who face challenges from insurers when it comes to proving and quantifying their loss,” saidSamantha Holland, head of insurance at law firm Gowling WLG. “It’s therefore realistic to expect a slew of hard-fought disputes with insurers and a continuing period of uncertainty for policyholders.”

    — With assistance by Lukas Strobl

    Source: Read Full Article